The Philosopher

A review of "The Making of a philosopher." - By Colin McGinn

And 'quite a change from the reality of solitary reading, study, contemplation, thought and research with an end product of lose, revelation and discovery to the world of social practice often one plus one equals two. Often the search for enlightenment and discovery that leads us to the pinnacles of total ignorance and insoluble mystery that the practice of what has been proven to work. It seems philosophicallylegal and practical to assume and expect that the path to enlightenment and discovery only leads to a cascading sequence of knowledge and ignorance, light and darkness, revelation, discovery and loss. With these expectations and more often I have a book to read, listen to an audio file or watch a scene, despite the usual practice of listening to authority on the acceptance and practice of a professional. It seems more likely, and it is true that the authorities and the professionalism thatdo not even have the will of my ashtray, and can often lead us on the road to nowhere.

We know from the outset that there was no intention or interest, challenge authority or denigrate the professionalism, I do not claim expertise and authority in matters of the author is celebrated and recognized, yet I feel I have to say a word or two, here and there with some of the most controversial and some others I feel had sometype of circular reasoning and logical argument in the shade. It 'clear and is much more than a matter of fact, the philosophy of the totality of what is known so far in question is known and will never know what is and what never will be, so it is inherently prone to substantial differences in interpretation and understanding between the people who make their profession and practice. I have not read any of my works of the professor of my knowledgephilosophy and all his work is very limited and I ask an apology and promise to hunt and read them all. I would not call my review a critic of his book is not a reputation, it is rather a preliminary inquisition, in an attempt to make sense of the nature of some of the fundamental questions of philosophy in the book to be as quick as it gets said .

Because it is clear that the book is not about philosophical issues or philosophy, but a biography of a philosopherand make it clear that on matters of importance and significance of philosophy has populated its pages. E 'is also clear that the philosopher has crossed the Cascade mountains of enlightenment and ignorance before reaching its peak of species, I refuse to keep him for his views already held, but only to those whom he seems to have kept or found . I feel it is for me to bother with the particulars of the book to meet the specificpoints and facts and arguments on which my lack of understanding and explanation and at other times, other possible alternatives to what my opinions are based. I've often read biographies and almost always found that, although the story is about a life of recent or a relatively recent, the story is often told from its beginnings to the recent stand and reality.

Since it is often difficult to build from top to bottom we are almost always taken an abrupt onsetin time and in one position and the reality of the proposed time of narration; May backtracking step is simply incompatible with the general movement and the growth of things in nature that the natural order of things is that they move and develop a one-way necessarily close in time for the start of things and everything, and then from there continue along the path of time. In a sense, maybe we're just used to and have adapted to the logic andsequential incremental path of development or are already wired in the way the rest of the universe is connected, we can only understand everything in a sequence of past, present and future in all our stories, we often begin early in the past and of things to come the present and the prognosis of the future. It is therefore not surprising that we are taken for the beginning of the humble beginnings of the life of a professor in the earlier chapters of his book. Although it is the basisfoundations of his first quest age and educational stations that carried him to his later years the philosophical adventure and a suite, I find no problems of philosophical significance of normal and common early inquisitions, looking for direction and forget that we all go through a stage of development in the physical and spiritual life. This is a break from more traditional ways of telling a story that a biography of development of philosophy in a person's lifeis a story of a person's development philosophy. In this sense, there is a reversal of tradition and a new and admirable and all the new approaches and new discoveries.

That said, I am a bit 'disturbing as the philosopher explains, "it feels like you're in a bar in New York to talk with your friends, but in reality you are stuck in a barrel somewhere around Cleveland hallucinating , what they do is to produce a single simulation of the ordinaryphysical world, a virtual world of pure sensory data. "I can always understand and feel that it is not difficult to see or understand or even relate to an objective reality, and a cause of objective data, but given a further objective to cause an expansion or extension of an objective reality, but not short the ability to understand a virtual reality product pure sense data. I could be wrong and I stand corrected if they are, or could be excused formy naive or uninformed, but how could it be possible to a simulation of an objective reality in a certain way to produce pure? Simulation is not by definition, assumes an objective reality of the simulated data the goal? It would be safe to assume that all data on an objective reality, always or almost always incomplete, because the reality has affected and effected by infinite variables and dynamic? As the philosopher seems to agree that the simulations are basedon objective data from the impactor, shall not address the difference between the simulation and the simulation of the simulated missing data missing from the simulation for the failure to find all the data for all variables and, if found and knew the impossibility duplicate or in modern scientific terminology, and cloning them.

Then in his statement always leaves me with a kind of twilight philosophical when he says: "If we are able to reproduce these signals(Which indicates our senses from the objective reality), without the help of real physical objects, we can simulate the experience of objects without regard to reality. "A fundamental fact for me is that the simulation takes place in a controlled environment that is familiar and, possibly, variables over and the reality on the other hand, an infinitely variable phenomenon in a dynamic environment. Pré taking the" if "is not possible, but the best possible and there is a differencebetween the possible and if possible, before, even if they are based on current knowledge and reality, expanding the deduction is possible, but not on any reality at all as suggested. If nothing else, the data reaches our senses are pieces of information at least a physical representation of reality in place or have a material objective reality. I heard that might be most appropriate for a number of important recent scientific revelations that were published on one of the most recognized quotepublications in the scientific community, Scientific American, November 2006 Issue, I've heard that supports what I have questioned above. 'Observing another person, an emotion experienced cognitive processing of sensory information that trigger that finally results in a logical conclusion of what the other feels.

It can also lead to direct mapping of sensory information to motor structures the experience of emotions that would leadthe observer. "It seems safe to assume that the man himself and his hard form (not the self upon him) conclusion is the result of years of experience sharing of information encoded in our genes and proteins that preceded our birth, our parents and perhaps also that of our grandparents in the configurations of the pieces of information that our predecessors were originally built on. In a sense, to a certain level, then the basis of what we now know that there mayIf a match of a number of fundamental entities of all persons who apply, regardless of time, distance and condition? We only know what we know and what we do not let the bright future to show what has that power. In any case, the explanation and remains, one thing seems pretty clear here and that the human brain works and see the future and is now based solely on some past experience or present material either jointly or individually, and that makes it time andwhat we call a three-way union to be over for now and for the future, the future is what is in our mind what is and what his what his objective reality in the real world, if we are aware or less. What we do has its intentions for the future and what we base our actions of yesterday and our actions today. "Our common sense beliefs are not as rational as previously thought impregnable love early in their foundations."

The quote above seems to suggest that our beliefsprior to our study based on their foundations, so that information about us before our own, so some of our beliefs can be passed to us by our predecessors, we can take for granted, but their happiness with an apparent invulnerability rationale for their initial start shorthanded but the logic seems at the moment and the condition is in itself a rational proof. The irrationality observed, however, seems to be based on the changing and increasinglychanging circumstances over time that simply did not take sufficiently into account. These imperfections should not be limited only to our beliefs, extends to the whole and every part of our make us the inquisition of their foundations to get a little spark here and now, a little 'there and then and a bit' of time and again. Revelation from the way it seems to happen on our research and inquisition and rarely by chance when a thing calledcoincidence. In our journey through time in space, often not all the pieces of information about something completely when they do we seem to experience the thrill of revelation. Often our inquisition inquisition is nothing but the missing piece in what form and shape. In experiments and scientific discoveries or the fat of prayer and meditation or other forms of research, it is often the missing piece of material that provides a rationalreality in which we find ourselves when we have all the investigations and we have been and always will be, and we certainly true, the material foundations for them and do not seem to be mere inventions. In short, I would say that the reason can not creator of reality, but reality can ever be justified. The force of reason is really the hidden reality or truth, which otherwise might seem beyond the realm of knowledge and understanding, but not a reality, butin space, time and place of reason alone. Why can really change and shape reality and yes! Therefore, pushing the edge of reality, the beginning and end as a reason by definition, a logical construction of what was, what, and what can be achieved with the objective reality of space-time.

These are the foundations of reason and rationality. As is clear to me and what I refer to the explanation of the meaning and what it represents, I feel a little 'time, location and condition of reference are missing players play as a determinant for the beginning to make sense to describe a reality. John is not John, because he was born to get married and Uncle William and his long relationship with John, because John was born Uncle William and Aunt Marry had a long relationship, born at a certain point in space and nowhere otherwise and at any other time to a people of common cultural reference or otherwise. Snow is whiteHow true this is in English and called the chacha ducha Buch English and English into another language, when one is confronted with the reality of snow were in the place where they were at the appropriate time, and by appointment, they agreed to call them and compare the secondary feature was already come to an agreement or vice versa. It can be white is white because it is complemented by another sense organ, and the third refers to white in the sameany language. White is white because white reflects light of a wavelength of light from any surface that is only white. White light is the same wavelength, regardless of the language reference and which would make sense and easy to interpret between languages. In the process of language seems that our senses are complementary and often one or other of convergent cognitive meaning, without taking into account the diversity of languages. Suppose that we test and the LemonAt the same time, knowing citrus scent. Lemony fragrance comes from a known molecular formula that will reach every people is in contact with body odor that continues to be the same, regardless of any language that establishes a common frame of reference from which meaning can be determined by survey. Somehow our senses are in constant exchange of information and establish a common reference for everything and anything that one of our senses.

A blind man and aview man as you can put a lemon is a common reference and to reach an agreement that I should call it a lemon, because seeing the human visual perception is complemented by an odor sensing organs and the smell of the blind are often perceived complimented by his sense of touch. An agreement lemon lemon can be reached between a blind, one deaf, without a language and a sense of smell because there is often a common reference object from which thesame meaning can be determined. In a sense, the human equivalent of two blind and visually impaired people with different linguistic backgrounds are able to refer to a common fund and draw meaning from what they experience through time and space, regardless of their language. The truth depends on establishing common reference. "Imaginary entities have no reality beyond the intentions of the authors, are invented, not discovered. This is why we call themfiction, and differentiating fiction non-fiction in bookstores and libraries. "It seems to me that happiness is not having a real differentiator for the fiction of a non-fiction, instead of happiness measurable and can be considered variables in the model and consequently the availability of them in a non- fiction, which is the reason for the wide gap that is. Fictive entities are possible extensions of our current experience near or distant past, too small or too large, and in the near futurethe distant future without the burden of proof. Was or was not the existence of reality is the driving force of the unknown to find out and reveal what is different is not it? The reality is limited to our current state of perception and cognition? If so, what is this quest for the cosmic microwave background is to look at the beginning of the universe? If this cosmic background radiation at the beginning, that he lied in his background? Pure information?

If it's pureinformation, the substance or material? What is and what makes our neurons fire when they perceive any material which is received by one or some or all of our senses? If not what is? Until now, the story is a testament to how last year's fiction and fictional characters are real? As such, many times could also be served as a guide sets out to find the discovery of reality. They could also belowreality of reality open and only goal of the author's published insights without the burden of quantification and qualification? Even without the how and why they come to the conclusion and the drafting of them? I could only go further and let everyone's mind intuitive to think about. "If I take the test and beets do not want, does not make sense to say that one of us is not just about the testiness of beets and other things." What is the car is very differentWhat about self and say that the self is very different from that on yourself. If what the individual self is only the universe itself is about the uniqueness follows the same, but what about the other due to a common reference itself. Therefore testiness so much of himself as about the self, but not us and them. For there is no equivalence of reference of the special between us and them, me and him, while there is no need toequivalence between self and non self. "Remember the taste of rotting flesh of a vulture, as opposed to how it would taste for the color of a man is so;. The color of an object's color seems to have the normal observers in normal circumstances, but what if the Martians which is normal for them is not normal for us. What we need here is to recognize that our roses are red and green Martians, through no fault of both parties. "

The theory of relativity, we have givenrelativistic way of looking at and understanding what reality gives way to absolute when it comes to light and establish the fact that the speed of light, as the absolute reference for everything and moves in this universe. Whether we are on Mars or Mercury, and if we are Martians or Mercurians a green light reflected from an object will have the same wavelength and establishing the fact that green is independent observers, the green-term, but coulddifferent because it is a consequence of the conventional, so we could expect to be convened by Mercurians green as could be accepted as a Martian red. "But we must always distinguish carefully between the external thing we are thinking and the mental act of thinking a certain way Sense is like the visual perspective;. We see the same external object, but from different angles, so that it contains two different visual aspects to us,is an object and two ways to grasp. "And 'once again focus on our vision higher and total contempt for the rest of our sensual effects as there are those who asked me to throw some questions and thoughts and allow you to do this.

Is the above statement assumes that those who are born blind and have not seen a light day of his life, think of something outside? Or is he lacks a single vision? If he had a unique vision of what would become?These are all things that we think visually similar? How can we visualize things to think odor, pain, loss, love tests and in the absence of an external physical representation that we are able to see behind the blind at birth? As mentioned, a duality of light, the light goes out and comes to us, and a light inside and can not enter or come to us, or continue any act of perception is ultimately reduced to a little 'bite neuron and the brainsmakes perfect sense because it is the smell, the visual, sensual and testing before a final decision on what and how necessary it should be reduced to some 'neuronal and bite, which in this case is the most common and core language everyone understands and communicates with the brain.

This will have taken and the absolute reference for all parts of the brain and other brains, and for effective communication andunderstanding. The philosophy and we are in an amount that is allowed to stretch or stretch on the right, then, as it may seem unlikely for this assumption to make, I make no charge for the qualification and quantification as to what I had not known that satisfied with the explanation and let your imagination and stretch the margin. Finally, as we do important step towards enlightenment and ignorance, there are limitssmaller and shorter gaps to fill in the blanks to make each piece of our knowledge and remain completely and merge science with philosophy and science. Until all the holes are filled and the boundaries cease to exist in the language of mathematics we will try to fill the gaps with the philosophy and maintain our world continues to compete and reality.

My Links : Lasik Vision Correction Information Heart Rate Watches Store. LOWER Prices Sick Children